The challenge of understanding why a model makes a specific decision.
Explainable AI (XAI), or interpretability, is a field of research focused on developing methods and models that allow humans to understand and trust the results and output created by machine learning algorithms. For complex models like LLMs, which have billions of parameters, this is a profound challenge. Their decision-making process is distributed across a vast network of connections, making them inherently 'black boxes.' We can observe their inputs and outputs, but the internal reasoning is opaque. The need for explainability is critical in many domains. In healthcare, a doctor needs to know why an AI model diagnosed a patient with a certain disease. In finance, a loan applicant has a right to know why an AI system denied their application. Without explainability, it's difficult to debug models, identify and correct biases, ensure the model is not relying on spurious correlations, and build user trust. Several techniques are being explored to improve the explainability of LLMs. One approach is feature attribution, which tries to determine how much each input token contributed to a particular output. For example, in a sentiment classification task, these methods might highlight the specific words in a sentence that were most influential in the model's decision to classify it as 'positive.' Another approach is to train smaller, simpler 'surrogate' models (like a decision tree) to approximate the behavior of the complex LLM on a specific set of data, as the simpler model's logic is easier to inspect. A third direction is to prompt the model to explain its own reasoning, leveraging techniques like Chain-of-Thought to generate a step-by-step explanation alongside its answer. However, these generated explanations are not always faithful to the model's actual internal process, and this remains a major open research problem.